Minus Mel Chin’s Revival Field and Maya Lin’s The Character of a Hill, Under Glass there is not a lot of Land art in the Twin Cities area. Land art is distinguishable from public art and sculpture in that the process of creation is interested in the nature of places and contemplation of context within the landscape. Although environmentalism is not always the focus, ecological issues are usually tied-in.


Introduction to Land Art

When encountering Land art, meaning is found behind the process of creation, documentation, chosen media, and site location. As you will soon see, there are many similarities and differences between Land art, public art, and sculpture gardens. It is important to remember that all art, regardless of structure, has an agenda and can be interpreted in a variety of ways depending on its location.

While difficult at first to distinguish, Land art is valuable for viewers and artists alike as it challenges conceptions of art with its consideration for the creation of works outside of studios, and placement of works outside of gallery and museum spaces. Furthermore, its method of creation is pre-meditated by the artists and the process of creation and entropy are documented by cameras and film.

I would like people in my geographical area to become aware of local Land art pieces and their striking difference from sculpture and public art pieces because I believe Land art is powerful in the way that it comments on the industrial and its competition with nature. I think in recognizing and discussing Land art, we are given the opportunity to fuel social and environmental change through altered perceptions of everyday life and values.

A Reaction to Modernity

Earthworks and Land Art truly took off in the 1970s-80s as a reaction against Modernism. Before it subsided in mid-80s, Land art had become widespread across America. While Land art is not prevalent today in the Midwest, people should be able to recognize or remember the few pieces that are present, from Andrew Leicester's Cloverleaf (1982) at the intersection of 494 and 35E, to Mel Chin's Revival Field (1990-1993) in West Saint Paul at Pig Eye's Lake landfill.

Following Minimalism and Post-minimalism, Land art found its niche as art outside the gallery setting. Around the same time sculpture gardens, like the Walker in Minneapolis, were constructed in an effort to break out of the box of formalism. Although the Walker was constructed as a reclamation of a wasteland area in Minneapolis, the formalism of the gallery aesthetic pervaded the outside space, thereby killing any Land art intentions of specific sculptures.

In terms of Art History,  Earthworks and Land art can be seen as a movement in reaction to a reaction:
Finally, Earthworks and Land art are not unique to America, though there are qualities of American Land art that differ greatly from say, European land art. While American Land artists worked to comment on the industrial by making works that attempted to conquer nature, literal gouging in the landscape (Michael Heizer, Double Negative, 1969-1970), British Land artists like Richard Long (A Line Made By Walking, 1967) and Andrew Goldsworthy (Balanced Rock Misty, 1977) worked to celebrate the pastoral setting, connecting with nature, working with it, and leaving no trace.

No comments:

Relevant Texts/Bibilography

  • Beardsley, John. Earthworks and Beyond. 3rd Edition. Abbeville Press Publishers: New York. 1998.
  • Berry, Thomas, The Dream of the Earth
  • Hinman, Lawrence, Ethics, a Pluralistic Approah to Moral Theory
  • Seine, Harriet. "Urban Sculpture: Cultural Tolkens or Ornaments to Life?" Art News v.78, Sept. 1979, p.108-114.
  • Tufnell, Ben. Land Art. Tate Publishing: London. 2006.

Have you heard of Earthworks or Land Art before?

Has this Blog helped you identify what Land Art is?

Have I effectively explained Land Art's importance to Minnesotans?

About Me

My photo
200 RYS Level 3 Reiki B.A. English Literature and Art History

Site Meter